The Major Topics of School Algebra

Quadratic Equations

Before approaching quadratic equations, students need some firm grounding in the
concept of a square root, which is more subtle than usually realized. Given a positive
number s , then there is one and only one positive number r so that r2 = s. The fact
that there is such an r is not trivial to prove, and, in fact, cannot be proved in school
mathematics. But the fact that there is at most one such r, i.e., the uniqueness of this
r, can be demonstrated with care to eighth graders and beyond. By definition, this r
is called the square root of s, and is denoted by . Thus by the definition of the
notation, is always ≥ 0. From the uniqueness of the square root, one concludes the
critical fact that

for all positive a, b

This fact is usually either left unexplained, or relegated to verification by calculator for a
special cases. We recommend that it be carefully explained (proved), not only because
students can learn from such reasoning, but also that they need to learn such reasoning
to prepare them for advanced mathematics.

Now let x be a number. Then a quadratic equation in one variable is an equality of
the form (or can be brought to this form by the associative, commutative, and distributive
laws) ax2 +bx+c = 0 which asks for all the real numbers x that make this equality valid
(a, b, c are constants and a ≠ 0). A solution, or a root, of the equation is a real number
which satisfies the equation, i.e., . To solve the equation is to find
all the solutions of the equation. It may be pointed out to students at the outset that,
unlike the case of a linear equation in one variable, some quadratic equations do not have
solutions, e.g., x2 + 3 = 0.

The method of solution dates back to the Babylonians some four thousand years ago.
It consists of two steps:

(A) One can solve all quadratic equations of the form a(x + p)2 + q = 0, if it
has a solution.

(B) All quadratic equations can be brought to the form in (A) by the use of
the associative, commutative, and distributive laws .

Solving (A) is relatively straightforward: if it has a solution, it has to be one of two

Again, the precise method of arriving at these solutions is worth repeating. First, if
we assume that there is a solution
, then we have an equality among numbers:
, from which we conclude that must have one of the two possible values
as above. This does not say that these values are indeed solutions of a(x + p)2 + q = 0.
For that, we have to directly verify that

This is a routine computation. The point, however, is that solving a quadratic equation
involves nothing but computation with fixed numbers. The consideration of “variables”
does not enter.

A little reflection is in order at this point. For to be solutions (i.e., points
on the number line), necessarily q/a ≤ 0, because there is no square root of a negative
number in the sense defined above. Conversely, as we have seen, if we know q/a < 0, then
are solutions. Thus we have proved, incidentally, that

a(x + p)2 + q = 0 has solutions q/a ≤ 0.

The proof of (B) of course depends on the technique of completing the square. On
the one hand, this step is decisive for the solution, and is not one that yields easily to
discovery learning. On the other hand, once the idea of completing the square is accepted,
its implementation is quite routine. Indeed, if we know in advance that ax2 + bx + c can
be brought to the form a(x+p)2 +q for some suitable p and q, then expanding the latter
by the distributive law gives

ax2 + bx + c = ax2 + 2apx + (ap2 + q)

Comparing the coefficients of both sides, we conclude that letting


should work. Indeed it does, as a simple computation shows. Another way, equally valid,
of looking at this process is to ask what can be put in the box to make the expression
within the parentheses a square:

Bearing in mind that (x2 + 2kx + k2) = (x + k)2, we easily come to the same answer.
Recalling the earlier formula for the roots of a(x + p)2 + q = 0 as , we have
now obtained the famous quadratic formula for the roots of ax2 + bx + c = 0:

(Note that this derivation requires the use of the identity .) The earlier
reasoning about the solvability of a(x + p)2 + q = 0 leads to a similar conclusion:

ax2 + bx + c = 0 has solutions b2 − 4ac ≥ 0.

Completing the square is a basic technique in school mathematics, and its significance
goes beyond getting the roots of a quadratic equation. When we get to the discussion of
quadratic functions, for example, we will see how it leads to a complete understanding of
their graphs.

It remains to bring closure to this discussion by mentioning that, if the quadratic
polynomial ax 2 + bx + c (a ≠ 0) already comes in the form for some
numbers then solving the quadratic equation becomes
extremely pleasant: the roots are and . This is because the following basic fact about
numbers implies that or .

If pq = 0 for two numbers p and q, then one of p and q is 0.

The proof of this fact should be emphasized in the classroom: By FASM, we may act as
if p and q are both rational numbers , which may be taken to be quotients of integers. So
suppose p ≠ 0, we will prove that q = 0. Indeed, multiply both sides of pq = 0 by the
reciprocal of p, we get immediately q = 0, as desired.

The long and short of it is that, if a quadratic polynomial is already factored as a
product of linear polynomials , then the corresponding quadratic equation can be solved
by inspection. This is certainly one reason why the factoring of quadratic polynomials
is of interest, and this fact can be used to motivate the usual exercises on factoring such

It is a remarkable fact that, conversely, if we can solve a quadratic equation, then we
also obtain a factorization of the corresponding quadratic polynomial. Let ax2+bx+c = 0
be given. Denoting the roots given by the quadratic formula by and as above, then
we claim that the following identity in x is valid:

for all x

Why this is remarkable is that it allows us to recover the whole expression ax 2 + bx + c
completely as the product of as soon as we get to know the two values of
x at which ax2 +bx+c becomes 0 (i.e., and ). This can
be explained as follows. From the explicit expression of the roots of ax2+bx+c = 0
in terms of a, b, and c (i.e., the quadratic formula), we obtain the following interesting
relations between the roots and the coefficients of a quadratic polynomial:


which is the asserted identity.

In particular, we see that factoring quadratic polynomials can be made entirely mechanical:
just use the quadratic formula to get the roots and apply the preceding identity.
Students should be made aware of this perspective to the factoring of quadratic polynomials.

Many students do not see that the identity requires
any proof. This is an example of a not-uncommon confusion between a simple statement
(if for all x, then and are the roots) and its not-so-
simple converse (if and are the roots, then for
all x). From this instance, we can see the need to stress reasoning in school mathematics.

If the quadratic polynomial is x2 + bx + c, i.e., if a = 1, then the preceding relations
between the roots and the coefficients simplify to


These attractive relations between roots and coefficients have generalizations to polynomials
of any degree.

The ability to solve quadratic equations greatly enlarges the range of word problems,
which up to this point involve only linear phenomena. One particular example is the
problem of finding the rectangle having the greatest area among all rectangles with a
fixed perimeter.

Prev Next