# Solving Equations Using Exponents and Logarithms

**Theorem 1.1. The Change of Base Formula ** If we
wished to find log_{7} 300,

we know that 7^{2} = 49, and that 7^{3} = 343, so log_{7} 300 is between two and
three.

We can narrow this guess down by using rational exponents, but we cannot “plug

it in” to a calculator , since there is no “log_{7}” key. We need a change of base

formula:

That is, we take the log (with any base) of the original mantissa, the number

we are taking the log of , and divide it by the log (with the same base) of the

original base. In our example, this gives

**Remark 1.2**. Our toolbox of solving equations now contains two powerful
tools:

the fact that logarithms and exponentials are inverse functions, and this change

of base formula. Let us see what we can do with them.

**Example 1.3**. Consider the equation e^{ln x} = 5.
Solve for x.

**Soln: **Since raising “e” to a power and taking the natural log are inverse

functions, when we compose them, we get x back:

e^{ln x} = x.

Then x = 5. This is, indeed, in our domain (the domain of
logarithms is the

positive reals ), so we are finished.

**Example 1.4.** Consider the equation e^{ln x} = −5.
Solve for x.

**Soln:** Since raising “e” to a power and taking the natural log are inverse

functions, when we compose them, we get x back:

e^{ln x} = x.

Then x = −5. This cannot be, however, since −5 is not in
the domain of ln x.

That is, ln (−5) does not exist. So we throw it away. This equation must have

no solution.

**Example 1.5.** Consider the equation ln (ln x) = 4.
Solve for x.

**Soln: **Use the fact that ln x is the inverse function of e^{x} to get rid of
one of

the ln’s: Raise “e” to the power of each side of the equation, and we have

As inverse functions, one of these cancel, leaving

ln x = e^{4}.

To rid ourselves of the remaining natural log, we may
again raise “e” to the

power of each side:

The left side cancels again, leaving

Although not pretty, ^{
}is certainly
positive, and in our domain.

Thus, we are finished.

**Example 1.6. **Consider the equation e^{3x+2} = 1. Solve for x.

**Soln1:** Notice that 1 = e^{0}. Then e^{3x+2} = e^{0} implies that 3x + 2 = 0. This

gives that x = −2/3 . Since the domain of e^{x} is all reals, we are finished.

**Soln2: **Using the inverse (logarithmic) function, we have that

ln e^{3x+2} = ln 1

Then the ln and the power of “e” cancel, leaving

3x + 2 = ln 1 = 0,

at which point we return to the first solution.

**Example 1.7. **Consider the equation
.Solve for x.

**Soln:** There is no slick trick that we can employ on this one, since 3 is not

a power of “e.” Therefore, we must resort to the inverse trick:

This gives us

x^{2} − 1 = ln 3.

For now, we will leave ln 3 in the equation, and continue to solve:

Since ln 3 > 0, the radicand is positive, and in our domain. Thus,

**Example 1.8.** Consider the equation e^{2x}− 4e^{x} + 4 = 0. Solve for x.

**Soln:** Hidden in this equation, there is a quadratic. Notice that (e^{x})^{2} = e^{2x}.

So our equation becomes

(e^{x})^{2} − 4e^{x} + 4 = 0

(e^{x} − 2)^{2} = 0

e^{x} − 2 = 0

e^{x} = 2

Then, making use of our logarithmic form,

x = ln 2.

**Example 1.9. **Consider the equation log_{7} x − log_{7} (1 − x) = 4. Solve for x.

**Soln: **Using properties of logarithms, we see the difference of the logs is the

log of the quotient:

By definition of log, we switch to exponential form:

This is in our domain, so we are finished.

**Example 1.10. **Consider the equation log_{13} (x^{2} − 3x + 15) = 1. Solve for x.

**Soln:** Using the “log roll,” or setting this equation back in exponential form,

we see that

13^{1} = 13 = x^{2} − 3x + 15

0 = x^{2} − 3x + 2

Then by hook, by crook, by completing the square, by quadratic formula, or by

factoring, we get that x = 1 or x = 2. Since both of these are in our domain,

we have our solutions.

**Example 1.11. **Consider the equation log_{2} 3x + log_{2} 4x = log_{2} 12. Solve for x.

**Soln: **Using the properties of logs, we see that the sum of logs is the log of

the product :

log_{2} 3x · 4x = log_{2} 12

log_{2} 12x^{2} = log_{2} 12

Similarly to how we solved exponential equations; namely, that if the bases were

equal, and the results were equal, the exponents must have been equal; we have

that two logs are equal and have the same base. Therefore, their mantissas

(stuff inside the log) must be the same:

12x^{2} = 12 => x^{2} = 1 => x = ±1.

However, if we use −1 for x, we get a negative value inside the logarithm in our

original equation. Therefore, we throw it out. The positive x value is valid, so

x = 1.

**Example 1.12. **Consider the equation 4^{x+3} = 5^{7-3x}. Solve for x.

**Soln: **In this case, we will not be so lucky as to have things cancel out, since

four and five are not the same base. How do we choose which logarithm to use?!

Since things will not cancel anyway, it does not matter. All that matters is
that

we get the x’s down from the exponent. We will use the natural log here, we

used the common log (base 10) in class. You can use whatever log you like.

ln 4^{x+3} = ln 5^{7-3x}

Using properties of logs , we can pull the exponents out in front:

(x + 3) ln 4 = (7 − 3x) ln 5

To get x on one side, and everything else on the other, we will have to
distribute.

Treat the logarithm like any other number, say a square root , or π , so that you

don’t drag it too far.

x ln 4 + 3 ln 4 = 7 ln 5 − 3x ln 5

Bringing all x’s to one side and everything else to the other yields

x ln 4 + 3x ln 5 = 7 ln 5 − 3 ln 4

x(ln 4 + 3 ln 5) = 7 ln 5 − 3 ln 4

Now, this is a completely acceptable answer. However, to get used to the
properties

of logs, we will simplify.

Bring all powers inside the log:

Use that the difference of logs is the log of the quotient and that the sum of
the

logs is the log of the product:

Which, if we really want to be special, can be simplified by the change of base

formula:

**Example 1.13. **Consider the equation
Solve for x.

**Soln:** By the properties of exponents, we have that

ln e^{x-2} = x − 2.

Since ln x and e^{x} are inverse functions, we get that

x − 2 = x − 2,

which is true for every x. Thus, our solution set is all real numbers.

**Example 1.14. **Consider the function
Solve for x.

**Soln:** By the properties of exponents, we have that

Since ln x and e^{x} are inverse functions, we get that

−1/2
= x^{2}.

This is impossible. Thus, we have no real solution for our equation.

**Remark 1.15. **Homework for the sections on logarithms will be the following:

• From 6.1 on exponents, problems 11 − 17, 21, 25, 31, 33, 35, 36

• From 6.2 on Euler’s constant, problems 1 − 5, 8, 12, 15 − 22

• From 6.3 on logs, problems 7, 9, 13, 15, 21, 30, 32, 34, 36.

• From 6.4 on the properties of logs, problems 3, 5, 7, 15, 63

• From 6.5 on solving equations, problems 1, 3, 5, 25, 35, 36, 37

There are 49 problems listed. Although it would behoove you to work all of them

in preparation of the test , only 25 will be turned in. Choose at least 4
problems

from each section, and the last 5 are your choice. This homework will be due

on Wednesday, 22 March.

Prev | Next |