English | Español

Try our Free Online Math Solver!

Online Math Solver












Please use this form if you would like
to have this math solver on your website,
free of charge.

Practice problems - Real Number System

1. If r is a rational number , (r ≠ 0) and x is an irrational number, prove that
r + x and rx are irrational.
Solution : Since the set of all rational numbers, Q is a field, −r is also a
rational number . Now, if r + x is rational, then x = (−r) + (r + x) must also
be a rational number due to the field axioms. But, x is irrational. Hence,
r + x cannot be rational . Similarly, one can show that rx is also rational.

2. Prove that there is no rational number whose square is 12.
Solution Suppose that there is a rational number whose square is 12. Since 4
is a factor for 12, let such a rational number be 2r where r is again a rational
number. This implies, r2 = 3. Suppose r = m/n in its lowest terms. Observe
that neither m nor n can be even. For, if m is even, say, m = 2k we have
4k2 = 3n2 implying n is even. (why?) Thus, both m and n are odd. Let
m = 2s +1 and n = 2t+1. We then have, (2s +1)2 = 3(2t+1)2. This implies,
2s2 + 2s = 6t2 + 6t + 1 and this is a contradiction.

3. Let E be a non empty subset of an ordered set ; Suppose α is a lower bound of
E and β is an upper bound of E. Prove that
Solution : Let Then we have and . Transitive property
of order , implies

4. Let A be a non empty set of real numbers which is bounded below. Let −A be
the set of all numbers −x where x ∈A. Prove that inf A = - sup(−A).
Solution : Let α=inf A. For any x ∈A, This implies, for all
−x ∈−A. This means −α is an upper bound of (−A). Also, If then
cannot be an upper bound of −A. For if it is, then for all
−x ∈(−A). This implies, and is a lower bound of A which is not
possible since is the inf A.

5. If is such that for every . Show that a = 0.
Solution: Let a > 0. Let . This implies 0 < a < a/2 by assumption.
Clearly, this is impossible.

6. Let Suppose that for every we have Show that
Solution: Suppose a > b. Then One can see this is impossible,
by choosing

7. Let u be an upper bound of a non empty set S of IR. Prove that u is the
supremum of S if and only if for every there exists a such that

Solution: Since u is an upper bound of S we have
Suppose u = supS. Then, for any is not an upper bound of S, and
hence there exists an element such that Conversely, the
condition given implies that no number less than u can be an upper bound.
Hence, u is the least upper bound of S.

8. If contains one of its upper bounds, show that this upper bound of S is
the supremum of S.
Solution: Suppose that is an upper bound of S but not the supremum
of S. Let be the supremum of S. Then, for all x
we have u < v. There exists a such that u < w. But this contradicts
the fact that u is an upper bound of S.

9. Let A and B be bounded subsets of IR. Show that is bounded. Show
that sup () = max {sup A, sup B}.
Solution: Let be real numbers such that and
| for all Define M = max {}. Then, for all
. So, is bounded. Further: Let sup A = u and sup B = v and
w = max{u, v}. For
Then, w is an upper bound of If z is an upper bound of then z
is an upper bound of A and B. And,
Therefore, w = ().

10. Let S be a non empty subset of IR that is bounded above. For any
define Prove that sup (a + S) = a+ sup S.
Solution: Let u = sup S, then for all . Then,
Thus, a + u is an upper bound for the set a + S. Thus,
Now, if v is any upper bound of the set a + S then for all
Consequently, for all so that v − a is an upper bound of S.
Then u = sup and so, Since v is any upper bound of
a + S and sup(a + S) is also an upper bound, we have

Prev Next